Minster marshes, river stour, save minster marshes, converter station on marshes,

Planning

KENT OPEN FLOOR HEARING RECORDINGS

11th November Part 1 Part 2  Part 3

12th November Part 1, Part 2

planning document links

Kent specific documents – updated to the latest versions

(this is a small selection of documents the full list can be found here)

CR1-025 Map of project (general arrangements plans)

6.2.3.1 Chapter 1 Landscape and Visual

6.2.3.2 Chapter 2 Ecology and Biodiversity

6.2.3.3 Chapter 3 Cultural Heritage

6.2.3.4 Chapter 4 Water Environment

6.2.3.5 Chapter 5 Geology and Hydrogeology

6.2.3.6 Chapter 6 Agriculture and Soils

6.2.3.7 Chapter 7 Traffic and Transport

6.2.3.8 Chapter 8 Air Quality

6.2.3.9 Chapter 9 Noise and Vibration

6.2.3.10 Chapter 10 Socio-economics, Recreation and Tourism

6.2.3.11 Chapter 11 Health and Wellbeing

6.2.3.12 Chapter 12 Intra-Project Cumulative Effects

6.2.3.13 Chapter 13 Inter-Project Cumulative Effects

7.5.1.2 Outline Construction Traffic Management and Travel Plan

7.5.4.2 Outline Onshore Overarching Written Scheme of Investigation

7.5.10.2 Outline Soil Management Plan – Kent

CR1-011 Access, Rights of Way and Public Rights of Navigation Plans.

KEY DATES

Monday 19 January

Written Representations to Change Request 1

Summaries of any WRs over 1500 words

26 january

Compulsory acquisition hearing (CAH) 

Issue specific hearing (ISH2)

Registration and seating available from: Virtual registration process from: 9.30am

Event start: 10.00am

All hearings will be blended events at: South Gallery Rooms 20-22 Excel London 1 Western Gateway Royal Victoria Dock London E16 1XL or By virtual means using Microsoft Teams

Tuesday 10 February

Deadline 4

 For receipt by the ExA of:

Written post hearing submissions including written summaries of oral cases made at hearings the w/c 26 January 2026.

Any further information requested by the ExA under Rule 17 of the Infrastructure Planning (Examination Procedure) Rules 2010.

Comments on any further information/ submissions received by deadline 3.

Comments on RRs and WRs relating to the effect CR1.

Tuesday 17 February

Deadline 4A Change request (CR1 DL4A)

For receipt by the ExA of:

Requests by interested parties (in relation to CR1) to be heard at an OFH.

Requests by interested parties (in relation to CR1) to be heard at a CAH.

Suggested locations for site inspections

(Accompanied (ASI) or Unaccompanied (USI)), including justification (in relation to CR1) for consideration by the ExA 

w/c 23 February

Dates reserved for hearings and/or ExA’s second written questions (ExQ2) (if required):  

•        Further ISH (if required).

•        Further CAH (if required).

•        Further OFH (if required).

•        ExQ2 (if required).

Tuesday 24 February

 Deadline 4B Change request (CR1 DL4B)

For receipt by the ExA of:

Applicant’s draft itinerary for accompanied site inspection (ASI) (if required)  

Tuesday 10 March

Deadline 5

Written post hearing submissions including written summaries of oral cases made at hearings the w/c 23 February 2026 (if held).

Responses to ExQ2 (if required).

The applicant’s updates – refer to annex E of the Rule 6 Letter

PADSS.

Any further information requested by the ExA under Rule 17 of the Infrastructure Planning (Examination Procedure) Rules 2010.

Comments on any further information/ submissions received by deadline 4.

Comments on the applicant’s draft itinerary for the ASI (if required).

Notification of a wish to attend the ASI (if required) on the w/c 23 or 30 March 2026

Wednesday 18 March

Publication by the ExA of:

Report on the Implications for European Sites (RIES) and any associated questions (if required).

w/c 23 March

and w/c 30 March

Dates reserved for hearings and/or ExA’s third written questions (ExQ3) and ASI (if required):

 • Further ISH (if required)

• Further CAH (if required)

• Further OFH (if required)

•  ExQ3 (if required)

 Monday 13 April

Deadline 6

•        Written post hearing submissions including written summaries of oral cases made at hearings the w/c 23 March 2026 (if held).

•        Responses to ExQ3 (if required).

•        Comments on the RIES (if issued) and responses to any associated questions.

•        Any further information requested by the

ExA under Rule 17 of the Infrastructure Planning (Examination Procedure) Rules 2010.

•        Comments on any further information/ submissions received by deadline 5.

 

Friday 17 April

Publication by the ExA of:

 • ExA’s commentary on, or schedule of changes to, the draft development consent order (dDCO) (if required).

 

Wednesday 29 April

Deadline 7

 •        Summary statements from parties regarding matters that they have previously raised during the Examination and that have not been resolved to their satisfaction.

•        Final versions of PADSS.

•        Comments on the ExA’s commentary on, or schedule of changes to, the dDCO (if issued)

•        The applicant’s closing summary statement.

•        The applicant’s final updates – refer to annex E of the Rule 6 Letter.

•        Comments on the deadline 6 submissions and any other information requested by the ExA for deadline 7.

•        Any further information requested by the

ExA under Rule 17 of the Infrastructure Planning (Examination Procedure) Rules 2010.

Tuesday 5 May

CONSULTATION CLOSURE DEADLINE

The ExA must complete the examination of the application within six months. 

The ExA may close the examination before the end of the six-month period  if it is satisfied that all relevant matters have been  addressed and discussed.

Accompanied Site Inspections (ASIs)

Purpose and How They Work: ASIs involve the ExA being guided around sites by the applicant (National Grid) and invited Interested Parties (IPs) to observe specific features, such as landscape impacts, access points, or mitigation measures. Unlike hearings, these are not forums for debate, oral submissions, or cross-examination—participation is limited to pointing out relevant elements during stops along a pre-planned itinerary. The applicant drafts the itinerary (covering key issues from representations), which the ExA reviews and finalizes. The itinerary is published at least 5 working days in advance, and the event is recorded for transparency.

  • When and Where: Not yet scheduled, but reserved for the week commencing 2 February 2026 (exact dates TBC if deemed necessary). Sites are selected based on relevance, accessibility (preferring public land), and submissions from IPs. The ExA decides if an ASI is needed after reviewing written evidence and hearings.

  • Your Role as an Interested Party:

    • Comment on Itinerary: Review and provide feedback on the applicant's draft by Deadline 2 (9 December 2025).

    • Register to Attend: If an ASI is confirmed, notify your interest by Deadline 3 (7 January 2026).

ofgem Consultation

OFGEM have approved advanced funding

(48% of undisclosed estimated project costs)

1) Early construction activities.

2) Compulsory purchase of land.

3) Enabling works such as reconductoring the newly built line from Richborough to Canterbury (this line is not included in the Sea Link DCO or within order limits for project).

4) Early procurement commitments (buying cables etc).

5) Other activities approved in advance by Ofgem (not disclosed).

The funding is for 48% of the total projected project cost, higher than the usual 20% cap for advancing projects without planning permission.

OFGEM CONSULTATION CAN BE FOUND HERE

DATABASE

Discover our structured Airtable database below, tailored for searching of all National Grid Sea Link submission documents to the Planning Inspectorate, with searchable tags.

Submit your document reviews via the "Add Review" tab. We will then include this in our final submission to the planning inspectorate.

Watch the video guide below for a step-by-step tutorial on navigating the database

HOW TO USE THE DATABASE

RESPONSE TO PLANNING INSPECTORATE

A very big thank you for all the hours of hard work reading through the 412 documents and formulating a response. It should not have been made this difficult.

Below are the responses from: Save Minster Marshes, CPRE, IUCN and KWT.